According to a new study, if you live in an activity-friendly neighbourhood such as public transport stops and parks, it will push you to exercise up to 90 minutes more per week.
Researchers mapped out the neighbourhood features from the areas around the participants’ homes, such as residential density, number of street intersections, public transport stops, number of parks, mixed land use, and nearest public transport points.
The study published in The Lancet journal included 6,822 adults aged 18-66 from 14 cities in 10 countries.
Physical activity was measured by using accelerometers worn around participants’ waists for a minimum of four days, recording movement every minute.
Read: Towards a healthier life-A foolproof way to shed those exta kilos
On average, participants across all 14 cities did 37 minutes per day moderate to vigorous physical activity – equivalent to brisk walking or more.
The four neighbourhood features which were most strongly associated with increased physical activity were high residential density, number of intersections, number of public transport stops, and number of parks within walking distance.
The researchers controlled for factors including age, sex, education, marital and employment status and whether neighbourhoods were classed as high or low income.
The difference in physical activity between participants living in the most and least activity-friendly neighbourhoods ranged from 68-89 minutes per week, representing 45-59% of the recommended 150 minutes per week. (Shutterstock)
The activity-friendly characteristics applied across cities, suggesting they are important design principles that can be applied internationally.
The difference in physical activity between participants living in the most and least activity-friendly neighbourhoods ranged from 68-89 minutes per week, representing 45-59% of the recommended 150 minutes per week.
“Neighbourhoods with high residential density tend to have connected streets, shops and services meaning people will be more likely to walk to their local shops,” said lead author James Sallis, from the University of California, San Diego.
“Distance to nearest transport stop was not associated with higher levels of physical activity, whereas the number of nearby transport stops was, said Sallis.
“This might mean that with more options, people are more likely to walk further to get to a transport stop that best meets their needs,” he said.
“The number of local parks was also important since parks not only provide places for sport, but also a pleasant environment to walk in,” Sallis said.